Feb. 18, 2019
Legislative Report #6
Rep. Rick Holman, ND
District 20
On Saturday, March 2, at 10:00 a.m., District
20 Legislators will be at the Mayville State Library. Come with questions and
comments. We hope the weather will cooperate this time.
Last week we heard two bills dealing with infrastructure.
One and others deal with the source of funding. The main department bill
provides the funding to support operations. It will now move to the Senate for
further consideration. Here's the language that returns activity at the
worksite south of Mayville.
"The Department
of Transportation shall establish the Mayville Section as a satellite site of
the Hillsboro section. Seasonal winter services will originate in the Courtney,
Gackle, New England, and Finley if the department has an employee whose home
residence is located within the vicinity of the department section site or the
department hires an employee whose home residence is located within the
vicinity of the maintenance section site."
Gas tax funds our roads and bridges and it has been many
years since the North Dakota tax has been adjusted. The initial purpose of the
gas tax federal and state was to provide the funds to develop and maintain our transportation
system. Better roads and better gas mileage has made it necessary to find added
funding from other taxing sources. Here's the tax for our neighboring states.
Minnesota 28.6 cents per gallon, South Dakota 30, Montana 32.25 and North
Dakota 23. The federal rate is 18.4. What do you think?
Another topic that is discussed in the legislative session
is how we tax our oil production. The two taxes, which after being reduced in
2013, amount to 10% of the price received times the barrels of oil harvested.
By attaching it to both price and production, using two variables causes wide
fluctuations in the amount of money going in to the state treasury. That makes
long range planning difficult. I've played with the thought that if we removed
the price variable and just tied a set price to production like what is done
with the gas tax, the wide swings in oil tax income would be diminished. Last
month, the state's oil wells produced 1.4 million barrels of oil per day. Using
a historical dollar amount for the state's share and multiplying that by the barrels
of produced oil would eliminate the wide swings in oil tax income caused by
price fluctuations. The discussion will continue.
The House passed a bill to reduce or eliminate income tax. Our
state's income tax is lower than most except for the few states that don't have
an income tax. I was reminded in a floor speech that we need to have a three-legged
stool to balance our income structure. Sales tax, property tax, and income tax
together create a situation that funds our state's services while allowing a
certain amount of predictable security. Removing one leg from that stool makes balancing
more difficult.
Another tax credit bill that failed was one that would have
allowed an individual a tax credit for the costs of private schools or home
schools. The state has only so much money to work with so taking dollars away
from our public schools to support non-public education is questionable. I
cannot support that. I was surprised at how many votes it did get.
The Governor's proposal to change the structure of Higher
Education governance came to the House as a two-board plan, one for the two
research universities and one for the other nine schools. As I've stated
before, the single board plan has done a lot to eliminate competition and encourage
cooperation between all the schools. If
changes need to be made such as adjusting terms or expanding the size of the
board, that can be done. There's also a
bill in the Senate.
The funding bill for our Higher Education System passed the
House this week and only had a few votes against it. Most of the recommendations presented to the
Appropriations Committee were accepted so now it moves to the Senate for
further consideration. Salary increases and some infrastructure additions and
much different than two years ago when the Governor asked for major cuts in
funding. It's been about four years since some college employees have had a pay
raise.
Thanks for listening.
Rick Holman
No comments:
Post a Comment